The Financial Sharing Economy, its Users and Providers: Democratising the Capital Market?

Christina Öberg & Peter Dahlin

Journal of Innovation Management2025https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_013.001_0004article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The sharing economy, characterised by digitally intermediated exchanges among peers, has extended into the financial sector. While the sharing economy is often seen as democratising access to and the provision of resources and services, it remains unclear if its users and providers reflect the diversity of society at large. Using unique auction data from the financial sharing economy platform Toborrow, this paper categorises users and providers in the financial sharing economy. Findings indicate that participants are relatively homogeneous: the typical user and provider is a young male residing in a large city, suggesting that the reach of the financial sharing economy does not yet align with its democratic potential. This paper highlights the untapped potential of the financial sharing economy among underrepresented groups who could greatly benefit from alternative lending and borrowing options. Expanding access to these sharing economy platforms may help fulfil their promise of inclusivity and broaden the impact of the sharing economy within the financial sector.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_013.001_0004

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christina2025,
  title        = {{The Financial Sharing Economy, its Users and Providers: Democratising the Capital Market?}},
  author       = {Christina Öberg & Peter Dahlin},
  journal      = {Journal of Innovation Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_013.001_0004},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Financial Sharing Economy, its Users and Providers: Democratising the Capital Market?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.