arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The Use of ESG Ratings in Corporate Compensation Plans: Promises and Pitfalls

Charlie Cregan et al.

Compensation & Benefits Review2025https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687251329843article
ABDC C
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

This paper evaluates the use of third-party environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings as key performance metrics within executive and management compensation plans. Despite a widespread increase in ESG-linked compensation practices, there remains a paucity of research critically evaluating the use of third-party ESG ratings as meaningful performance metrics in this context. The paper utilises case-studies from the airline and banking industries to identify this emerging trend of ESG ratings-linked compensation. It goes on to synthesise extant research on ESG ratings to evaluate their suitability as performance metrics within the context of the broader executive compensation literature. We argue that the substantial evidence on the shortcomings of current ESG ratings, including divergence across rating agencies, opaque rating methodologies, and inadequate reflection of actual impact metrics, combine to present a material risk to the credibility and reviewability of such sustainability-linked compensation plans. Our critique highlights the ready potential and incentive for manipulation, where executives may influence the selection of ratings or utilise strategic disclosure tactics to achieve improved rating targets. We advise that companies and their boards prioritise objective measures of impact over existing third-party ratings when designing executive compensation criteria. We offer actionable recommendations for firms to adopt verifiable metrics aligned with their strategic objectives, drawing on frameworks provided by legislation such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and voluntary standards including the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). By doing so, companies can foster transparency and maintain shareholder trust and confidence while effectively incentivising management to deliver on key sustainability challenges.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687251329843

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{charlie2025,
  title        = {{The Use of ESG Ratings in Corporate Compensation Plans: Promises and Pitfalls}},
  author       = {Charlie Cregan et al.},
  journal      = {Compensation & Benefits Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687251329843},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Use of ESG Ratings in Corporate Compensation Plans: Promises and Pitfalls

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.