arbiter
JournalsAccount

Adolescents’ Trust in Political Content From Influencers: The Roles of Motive Attribution and Parental Mediation

Darian Harff et al.

Communication Research2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502261425708article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In today’s fragmented media landscape, social media influencers (SMIs) have emerged as popular political information sources among young audiences—despite often lacking political expertise. However, we have limited knowledge about factors that predict trust in SMIs’ political content during early and middle adolescence, a critical period during which political attitudes are formed. This study proposes two novel theoretical pathways to explain varying trust perceptions between and within adolescents: a source-centered pathway, focusing on observed SMI-audience interactions and motive attribution, and an audience-centered pathway, emphasizing adolescents’ digital literacy and parental mediation. A three-wave panel survey ( N W3 = 799 parent-child dyads) shows that trust in SMIs’ political information is higher among those adolescents who view SMIs as involved with their audiences and altruistically motivated, and among adolescents with high digital literacy and whose parents engage in active mediation. However, changes in these variables do not predict deviations from adolescents’ usual trust levels.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502261425708

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{darian2026,
  title        = {{Adolescents’ Trust in Political Content From Influencers: The Roles of Motive Attribution and Parental Mediation}},
  author       = {Darian Harff et al.},
  journal      = {Communication Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502261425708},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Adolescents’ Trust in Political Content From Influencers: The Roles of Motive Attribution and Parental Mediation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.