Policy–technology coevolution in electromobility: three national trajectories in China, the United States, and Japan

Adriana Martínez

Policy Design and Practice2026https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2026.2650224article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Electromobility has become central to decarbonization and industrial restructuring strategies worldwide, yet much of the literature examines public policy and technological change separately. This article analyzes how public policies and core electromobility technologies coevolve over time in China, the United States, and Japan between 2010 and 2025. Focusing on batteries, charging infrastructure, and electric powertrains, the study develops a qualitative comparative analysis of policy instruments and technological trajectories across three distinct governance contexts. The analysis identifies three distinct configurations of policy-technology coevolution: a strategic and state directed pattern in China, a decentralized and politically mediated pattern in the United States, and an incremental and path dependent pattern in Japan. These trajectories reveal how differences in sequencing, coordination, and policy recalibration generate divergent technological pathways and market outcomes. The article argues that policy design for emerging technologies is less a matter of instrument selection than of temporal alignment and adaptive sequencing. By conceptualizing electromobility transitions as coevolutionary processes, the study advances a process oriented perspective on policy design under conditions of rapid technological change and institutional diversity.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2026.2650224

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{adriana2026,
  title        = {{Policy–technology coevolution in electromobility: three national trajectories in China, the United States, and Japan}},
  author       = {Adriana Martínez},
  journal      = {Policy Design and Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2026.2650224},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Policy–technology coevolution in electromobility: three national trajectories in China, the United States, and Japan

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.