arbiter
JournalsAccount

Embedding Skill Bias: Technology, Institutions, and Inequality in Wages and Benefits

Sebastian Diessner et al.

Comparative Politics2025https://doi.org/10.5129/001041525x17367727003388article
ABDC A
Weight
0.61

Abstract

Is rising inequality an inevitable consequence of the transition to a knowledge-based economy? Departing from existing approaches in labor economics and comparative political economy, we develop an account of inequality in the knowledge economy that foregrounds the role of labor market institutions. We argue that collective bargaining institutions play a critical role in mediating the skill bias commonly associated with the diffusion of information and communications technologies (ICT), because they determine whether employers have the discretion to selectively reward strategically important high-skilled workers with greater wages and benefits. We then test our argument by carrying out cross-country analyses of both wage premia and non-wage benefits in the OECD countries. We find robust evidence in support of our theoretical propositions across a range of model specifications.

15 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5129/001041525x17367727003388

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sebastian2025,
  title        = {{Embedding Skill Bias: Technology, Institutions, and Inequality in Wages and Benefits}},
  author       = {Sebastian Diessner et al.},
  journal      = {Comparative Politics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5129/001041525x17367727003388},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Embedding Skill Bias: Technology, Institutions, and Inequality in Wages and Benefits

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.61

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.63 × 0.4 = 0.25
M · momentum0.88 × 0.15 = 0.13
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.