Leader self-development in local government: framing the antecedents of self-awareness
Dominika Bukalova & H. P. Schmitz
What the paper says
Purpose Self-awareness is an essential ingredient of leader performance. However, existing research has not unpacked the specific experiences and practices supporting the development and maintenance of self-awareness. This study establishes a framework to study self-beliefs and a dedication to leader self-development, which we understand to be the antecedents of self-awareness, using examples of mid-level administrative leaders. Design/methodology/approach The interview-based study first developed narrative case studies of 12 administrative leaders. In a second step, a cross-case analysis identified shared themes of individual sense-making linked to self-awareness and leadership practices. Findings The study develops a sequential model of leader self-development clarifying the types of personal experiences and self-study practices that may foster the development of self-awareness. This framework identifies self-study and other personal leadership practices as possible antecedents of self-awareness, including self-beliefs, receptiveness, reflective practices, and personal challenges experienced. Practical implications This study establishes a framework of self-development practices to integrate with dominant institutional formal leadership training programs. This complementary approach helps advance a research program on how self-study and other self-leadership practices can support public leadership development. Originality/value Prior research has highlighted self-awareness and reflective practices as essential to leader development and performance. However, how self-beliefs and a dedication to self-development is perceived by leaders in practice remains poorly understood. This research develops a framework of possible antecedent practices supporting individual self-awareness in a public sector context.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.