A model of bureaucratic capacities against democratic backsliding

Luciana Cingolani & Gabriela Spanghero−Lotta

Perspectives on Public Management & Governance2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf027article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The literature on democratic backsliding has paid relatively little attention to the role of the public administration in its potential to contain institutional dismantling. We introduce a theoretical model of the bureaucratic capacities that shape public agencies’ possibilities to resist political attacks by populist incumbents. The focus on organizational capacities fills a gap in bureaucratic contestation research, more commonly interested in the attitudes and policy preferences of individual public servants, or the legal strategies pursued by both parties. Our model grants particular attention to a set of autonomy-asserting incentives, in combination with agencies’ unique access to strategic governmental resources, to highlight their importance for bureaucratic contestation. In presenting the model, we contribute to the literature on administrative capacities and highlight existing contradictions that must be handled by specifying and limiting the institutional context where capacity is assessed.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf027

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{luciana2025,
  title        = {{A model of bureaucratic capacities against democratic backsliding}},
  author       = {Luciana Cingolani & Gabriela Spanghero−Lotta},
  journal      = {Perspectives on Public Management & Governance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaf027},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A model of bureaucratic capacities against democratic backsliding

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.