Cultural Dynamics and Knowledge-Sharing in Philippine Higher Education: A Multilevel Analysis

Malvin Tabajen et al.

Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management2025https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.23.2.3707article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines the cultural dynamics that influence knowledge-sharing in Philippine higher education institutions (HEIs). It addresses the gap in understanding the impact of national, organizational, and local (institutional) cultural factors on educators' intentions to share knowledge. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating quantitative analysis via multiple regression and ANOVA with qualitative insights from follow-up interviews. This comprehensive methodology suggests that cultural dimensions, such as power distance and collectivism, have a significant influence on knowledge-sharing intentions. The findings indicate that diminishing power distance and formalizing knowledge-sharing processes enhance the knowledge ecosystem within HEIs. These insights are valuable for educational practitioners, administrators, and policymakers who aspire to cultivate a collaborative and knowledge-rich environment. By customizing strategies to align with local cultural contexts, institutions can enhance teaching, research, and application, thereby advancing the domains of learning and organizational competitiveness.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.23.2.3707

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{malvin2025,
  title        = {{Cultural Dynamics and Knowledge-Sharing in Philippine Higher Education: A Multilevel Analysis}},
  author       = {Malvin Tabajen et al.},
  journal      = {Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.23.2.3707},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cultural Dynamics and Knowledge-Sharing in Philippine Higher Education: A Multilevel Analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.