Prediction with Incomplete Information

Megan Czasonis et al.

The Journal of Financial Data Science2025https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2025.1.199article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

A key requirement for forming data-driven predictions is to assemble the best possible set of observations for the predictive variables. This task, however, is not often easy. In the case of time-series data, some variables have shorter histories than others, and some variables are reported less frequently than others. And in the case of cross-sectional data, some information is not reported for every case. We are therefore faced with several choices. We can discard predictive variables with missing information. We can exclude observations with missing information and retain only those with full information for all the predictive variables. We can use statistical techniques to manufacture replacements for the missing information. Each of these approaches, however, has significant drawbacks. The authors propose a new procedure for treating missing information that enables us to retain more information than model-based approaches and, at the same time, to account for the relative reliability of observations with missing information.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2025.1.199

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{megan2025,
  title        = {{Prediction with Incomplete Information}},
  author       = {Megan Czasonis et al.},
  journal      = {The Journal of Financial Data Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2025.1.199},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Prediction with Incomplete Information

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.