arbiter
JournalsAccount

The consequences of employees’ perceived corporate social responsibility: A meta‐analysis

Yanling Wang et al.

Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility2020https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12273article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.75

Abstract

This paper reviews the relationship between employees’ perceived CSR and its dimensions and work outcomes, and explores the moderating effects of the samples’ demographic characteristics (i.e., gender, age), and national culture, based on a meta‐analysis of 65 studies from 67 samples. Results show that perceived CSR and its dimensions are positively related to employees’ positive attitudes and behaviours, and negatively related to their negative attitudes and behaviours. The results also partially support the moderating effects of the samples’ demographic characteristics in terms of age and gender, and national culture. This study supplements existing theoretical review articles, and further confirms the psychological effects of perceived CSR. In addition, the results further confirm the rationality of CSR practices and provide suggestions for enterprises to better use CSR strategies to motivate their employees.

134 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12273

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yanling2020,
  title        = {{The consequences of employees’ perceived corporate social responsibility: A meta‐analysis}},
  author       = {Yanling Wang et al.},
  journal      = {Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12273},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The consequences of employees’ perceived corporate social responsibility: A meta‐analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.75

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.