Competitive intensity, market and non-market strategies, and firm performance: evidence from Malaysia

John A. Parnell et al.

International Journal of Business Excellence2026https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbex.2026.150882article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper reports on findings from a survey of 129 managers in Malaysia. Cost leadership, differentiation, and political non-market strategy (NMS) were significant drivers of firm performance. Competitive intensity was positively associated with performance and negatively moderated the relationship between cost leadership and performance but did not moderate the relationship between differentiation and firm performance. Political NMS positively moderated the competitive intensity-firm performance link. In conjunction with the Twelfth Malaysia Plan (12MP) crafted to pursue high-income nation status by the year 2025, the results of this study can help Malaysian firms identify strategic tools to enhance global competitiveness. The findings also help Malaysian policymakers and regulators strengthen their mechanisms to fight corruption and mitigate Malaysian firms from engaging in political NMS.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbex.2026.150882

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{john2026,
  title        = {{Competitive intensity, market and non-market strategies, and firm performance: evidence from Malaysia}},
  author       = {John A. Parnell et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Business Excellence},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbex.2026.150882},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Competitive intensity, market and non-market strategies, and firm performance: evidence from Malaysia

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.