Institutionalizing human rights in sports mega events: a case study of the United 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup

Callum McCloskey et al.

Soccer & Society2026https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2026.2640517article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The North American 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup (FWC) is the first tournament in which human rights policies and plans have been in place for the awarding body and host nation from the bid stage. This paper examines the FWC human rights governance arrangements, through an analysis of strategic documents, observations of three host cities, and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Drawing on institutional theory, we argue that human rights institutional logic formation, via stakeholder engagement and isomorphic pressures, influences FIFA. However, we also demonstrate that this influence is limited due to the primacy of business agendas at the executive level. We conclude that while positive steps have been made, with human rights structures, policies, and processes now in place at FIFA, host nation(s) and host cities; issues of implementation remain throughout each level of the FWC institutional field.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2026.2640517

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{callum2026,
  title        = {{Institutionalizing human rights in sports mega events: a case study of the United 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup}},
  author       = {Callum McCloskey et al.},
  journal      = {Soccer & Society},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2026.2640517},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Institutionalizing human rights in sports mega events: a case study of the United 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.