How proximity and trust of policy narrators motivate their audience

Elizabeth A. Shanahan et al.

Journal of Public Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x25100937article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The effect of the narrator is understudied in the Narrative Policy Framework. We offer a systematic approach that details narrator definition, features (proximity to audience), and functions (audience trust). Informed by Construal Level Theory, we conducted an exploratory study ( n = 2268) that assigned proximal to distal narrator features (“your friend,” “your doctor,” “the CDC,” and a control “someone”) and affixed narrators to visual messages about getting the COVID-19 vaccine. We investigated the extent to which proximity, trust, and congruence between narrator and narrative form predicts motivation to vaccinate. Narrator alone had no significant effect, but the proximal narrator paired with proximal characters in the policy message did have significant effects on motivation to vaccinate. Individual trust of distal narrators elicits affective responses, whereas individual trust of the proximal narrator is associated with motivation. These results suggest effects of narrator feature, characteristic, and function are dynamic and contextual.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x25100937

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{elizabeth2026,
  title        = {{How proximity and trust of policy narrators motivate their audience}},
  author       = {Elizabeth A. Shanahan et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x25100937},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How proximity and trust of policy narrators motivate their audience

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.