The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a brief review

Matteo Carpi

Occupational Medicine2025https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae121review
AJG 1
Weight
0.70

What the paper says

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was first developed in 1989 by David J. Buysse and colleagues to assess sleep quality, particularly in clinical populations, with a focus on individuals with psychiatric disorders [1]. At the time, the authors noted that, despite the high frequency of sleep complaints associated with such conditions, there was a lack of standardized instruments to measure sleep quality and disturbances. Since its introduction, the PSQI has become widely adopted in both research and clinical settings, within and outside the fields of psychiatry and sleep medicine [2]. Being largely employed in diverse clinical samples, as well as in the general population and epidemiological studies, the questionnaire is now unanimously recognized as the most common subjective measure of sleep quality. As of October 2024, the original 1989 study has been cited 37 666 times on Google Scholar and 23 78 times on Scopus, and the PSQI is frequently mentioned as a key tool for clinical assessment in leading sleep medicine textbooks [3,4].

36 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae121

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{matteo2025,
  title        = {{The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a brief review}},
  author       = {Matteo Carpi},
  journal      = {Occupational Medicine},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae121},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a brief review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.70

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.82 × 0.4 = 0.33
M · momentum1.00 × 0.15 = 0.15
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.