arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

To Be and Not to Be: The Middle Management Paradox and Resistance Escalation Process During Transitions to Self-Managing Organizations

Émilie Bourlier-Bargues et al.

Management2025https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2025.9935article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Self-managing organizations (SMO) constitute a radical attempt to avoid hierarchical control and manager–subordinate authority relationships by suppressing them outright. For existing organizations, transiting to SMO poses significant challenges, especially for middle managers who became ‘architects of their own demise’. Combining 38 interviews, direct observation over 4 years, and secondary data we show in this paper that SMO transitions expose middle managers to a paradoxical situation that led them to engage in an escalation process of resistance that culminated in the subversion of the SMO experiment. These results contribute to SMO studies by documenting transition difficulties and the middle management paradox. Our study enriches knowledge on middle managers resistance in post-bureaucratic organizational forms by documenting the boundary conditions that allow the transition from individual to collective hidden and then collective, overt, and transformative forms of managerial resistance.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2025.9935

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{émilie2025,
  title        = {{To Be and Not to Be: The Middle Management Paradox and Resistance Escalation Process During Transitions to Self-Managing Organizations}},
  author       = {Émilie Bourlier-Bargues et al.},
  journal      = {Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2025.9935},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

To Be and Not to Be: The Middle Management Paradox and Resistance Escalation Process During Transitions to Self-Managing Organizations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.