Two Families Under One Roof: The Role of Social Identity and Organizational Justice During Backsourcing

Yongjin Ahn & Hemin Choi

Review of Public Personnel Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x251399922article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Backsourcing, the process of reclaiming previously outsourced services and reintegrating them into public organizations, has garnered increasing attention in the field of government contracting. While prior studies have emphasized fiscal and efficiency outcomes, limited research has explored its human resource implications, particularly its impact on employees. This study examines the experiences of backsourced employees (contracted managers transitioning to public service roles) and traditional public servants in South Korea. Through 27 in-depth interviews conducted at Veterans Service Centers and a nationally representative survey of public servants, findings reveal in-group/out-group conflict between two different groups of employees. The conflict stems from perceived differences in entry routes (meritocracy vs. political agendas) and dissatisfaction with task-reward alignment, leading to issues of social identity and organizational justice. This study highlights the critical need for fair procedures and equitable rewards to foster employee integration and mitigate conflict during personnel reforms involving backsourcing.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x251399922

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yongjin2026,
  title        = {{Two Families Under One Roof: The Role of Social Identity and Organizational Justice During Backsourcing}},
  author       = {Yongjin Ahn & Hemin Choi},
  journal      = {Review of Public Personnel Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x251399922},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Two Families Under One Roof: The Role of Social Identity and Organizational Justice During Backsourcing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.