Invisible Victims, Invisible Crimes: Institutional Erasures of Animals as Victims of Cruelty

Serrin Rutledge‐Prior

Law and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.70013article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

To receive justice in the legal system, one must be seen by the legal system; this is as true for nonhuman animal victims of crime as it is for human victims. Situating animal cruelty within the invisible crimes framework, this paper highlights the paucity of research on prosecutions and sentencing under animal welfare law. Due in part to a lack of transparency in the public and private institutions that regulate animal welfare, our understanding of how animals are recognized within legal systems has so far relied heavily on critiques of animal welfare legislation as written. Drawing on an original database of Australian prosecutions of cruelty cases ( n = 552) involving “pet” animals, this paper offers new, empirically centered perspectives on the legal treatment of animals. It calls for an expansion of the invisible crimes framework to include “invisible victims” and supports recent calls for animals to be recognized as crime victims.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.70013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{serrin2026,
  title        = {{Invisible Victims, Invisible Crimes: Institutional Erasures of Animals as Victims of Cruelty}},
  author       = {Serrin Rutledge‐Prior},
  journal      = {Law and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.70013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Invisible Victims, Invisible Crimes: Institutional Erasures of Animals as Victims of Cruelty

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.