arbiter
JournalsAccount

Structural Choices at Alliance Formation: Accounting for Partner Asymmetry in Industry Distance

Sergio Grove et al.

Journal of Management2026https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251410193article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Parties in an alliance aim to capture both common and private benefits. As they transfer and jointly create knowledge to generate common gains, differences in private benefits can arise due to asymmetric knowledge spillovers. Our model of alliance structural choices incorporates the alliance itself—the channel through which partner knowledge flows—to reflect the fact that partners and the alliance may operate in different industry contexts. We propose that partners select structural governance mechanisms (equity governance and alliance scope) to enable valuable knowledge flows while protecting themselves from unwanted spillovers. Analyzing a large sample of U.S. alliances from 1985 to 2024, we find that asymmetric distance predicts these governance choices and that it is linked to the simultaneous use of multiple structural safeguards, including equity governance and a narrow alliance scope.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251410193

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sergio2026,
  title        = {{Structural Choices at Alliance Formation: Accounting for Partner Asymmetry in Industry Distance}},
  author       = {Sergio Grove et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251410193},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Structural Choices at Alliance Formation: Accounting for Partner Asymmetry in Industry Distance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.