Quasi-Monte Carlo with one categorical variable

Veronica Ho et al.

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics2026https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2026.2656377article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We study randomized quasi-Monte Carlo (RQMC) estimation of a multivariate integral where one of the variables takes only a finite number of values. This problem arises when the variable of integration is drawn from a mixture distribution as is common in importance sampling and also arises in some recent work on transport maps. We find that when integration error decreases at an RQMC rate that it is then important to oversample the smallest mixture components instead of using a proportional allocation. This can even improve the rate of convergence. The optimal allocations depend on the possibly unknown convergence rate. Designing the sample with an incorrect assumption on the rate still attains that convergence rate, with an inferior implied constant. The penalty for using a pessimistic rate is typically higher than for using an optimistic one. We also find that for the most accurate RQMC sampling methods, it is advantageous to arrange that our $n=2^m$ randomized Sobol' points split into subsample sizes that are also powers of $2$.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2026.2656377

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{veronica2026,
  title        = {{Quasi-Monte Carlo with one categorical variable}},
  author       = {Veronica Ho et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2026.2656377},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Quasi-Monte Carlo with one categorical variable

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.