arbiter
JournalsAccount

Accountability for death(s): Reconceptualising corporate responsibility through thanatoaccountability

Erin Twyford et al.

Accounting History2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732251411552article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article challenges the narrow confines of traditional accountability by introducing thanatoaccountability as a theoretical framework. Through an analysis of the German company Degussa during the Holocaust, we uncover how accounting metrics and accountability mechanisms actively obscured and normalised corporate participation in genocide. Drawing on archival analysis, we show how accounting and accountability mechanisms were repurposed to identify, exclude and ultimately erase Jewish life – first from markets, then from the political sphere and finally from existence itself. Degussa's progression from initial resistance to active complicity reveals how routine business practices, cloaked in bureaucratic neutrality, normalised genocide, even when financial gains were minimal. Thanatoaccountability not only exposes the inadequacy of conventional legal and financial accountability in capturing these processes but also offers crucial analytical tools for understanding how modern corporations normalise systematic death, highlighting how accounting practices can be weaponised to facilitate death while simultaneously shielding corporations from accountability for those death(s).

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732251411552

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{erin2026,
  title        = {{Accountability for death(s): Reconceptualising corporate responsibility through thanatoaccountability}},
  author       = {Erin Twyford et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting History},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732251411552},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Accountability for death(s): Reconceptualising corporate responsibility through thanatoaccountability

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.