arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Understanding Motivations and Expectations of Scuba Divers

Carolin Lusby & Stuart Cottrell

Tourism in Marine Environments2025https://doi.org/10.3727/216901925x17364076067666article
ABDC C
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

This study examines scuba divers as a vital segment of the marine tourism market. To better understand scuba divers, motivation, expectations, and expectation outcomes were measured. A survey including 28 motivation statements adapted from the recreation experience preference scales was administered to 300 divers diving with different dive operators in the Florida Keys in summer 2002. Eighteen expectation variables with outcome statements were measured in a pre- and posttest format (expectations before the trip and outcomes after the dive trip). Nonparametric tests revealed differences between divers of different levels of development (i.e., beginning, intermediate, advanced, expert, postexpert). Beginners dove for the challenge and excitement while advanced divers dove to be with similar people, use equipment, and see shipwrecks. Findings show differences between Boy Scouts in a youth adventure program and divers (domestic and international) diving with a regular dive shop. Scouts dove for adventure and excitement. Scouts showed the highest scores in postevent expectation variables. Implications for dive operations to improve diver preparations are given.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3727/216901925x17364076067666

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{carolin2025,
  title        = {{Understanding Motivations and Expectations of Scuba Divers}},
  author       = {Carolin Lusby & Stuart Cottrell},
  journal      = {Tourism in Marine Environments},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3727/216901925x17364076067666},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding Motivations and Expectations of Scuba Divers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.