← Back to results Policy evaluation with sufficient macro statistics: a primer Régis Barnichon & Geert Mesters
Abstract Summary Impulse responses and forecasts are central concepts for policymakers. They are also sufficient statistics to solve many important macroeconomic problems, from policy counterfactuals to policy evaluation, and offer a promising alternative to the standard structural modelling approach. In this work, we discuss and extend recent progress on the use of these sufficient macro statistics for policy evaluation. We illustrate the methods by evaluating the performance of the European Central Bank over 1999–2023.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf022 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{régis2025,
title = {{Policy evaluation with sufficient macro statistics: a primer}},
author = {Régis Barnichon & Geert Mesters},
journal = {Econometrics Journal},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf022},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Policy evaluation with sufficient macro statistics: a primer
AU - Barnichon, Régis
AU - Mesters, Geert
JO - Econometrics Journal
PY - 2025
ER - Régis Barnichon & Geert Mesters (2025). Policy evaluation with sufficient macro statistics: a primer. *Econometrics Journal*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf022 Régis Barnichon & Geert Mesters. "Policy evaluation with sufficient macro statistics: a primer." *Econometrics Journal* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf022. Policy evaluation with sufficient macro statistics: a primer
Régis Barnichon & Geert Mesters · Econometrics Journal · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf022 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.