How the Pro-Beijing Media Influences Voters: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

JAY C. KAO

American Political Science Review2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055426101476article
AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Authoritarian regimes have increasingly leveraged foreign media to project influence within democracies, yet evidence of these co-opted outlets’ actual effects remains scarce. This study presents findings from a field experiment conducted during Taiwan’s 2020 general election, assessing the impact of The China Times, a Beijing-backed media conglomerate, on voter behavior and attitudes. The experiment incentivized participants to engage in sustained consumption of real-time news from this outlet in the weeks leading up to the election. Results from a panel survey linked to individual-level web-tracking data reveal that exposure to The China Times sways voters in favor of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). These effects, however, are primarily driven by nonpartisan and PRC-friendly voters. To the extent that I find effects among PRC-skeptics, they show evidence of backfiring. As Beijing’s media co-optation extends beyond Taiwan, my findings have broader implications for understanding the effectiveness and limitations of authoritarian influence operations.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055426101476

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jay2026,
  title        = {{How the Pro-Beijing Media Influences Voters: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment}},
  author       = {JAY C. KAO},
  journal      = {American Political Science Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055426101476},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How the Pro-Beijing Media Influences Voters: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.