Migrant, Entrepreneur, Man: Platform Food Couriers’ Navigation of Precarity and Vulnerability

Cosmin Popan

Journal of Sociology2026https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261425848article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Work on food delivery platforms is characterised by increasing vulnerability and a disproportionate representation of a racialised male workforce composed primarily of (undocumented) migrants. Despite mounting criticism of the gig economy model, entrepreneurial discourses and practices continue to be celebrated, produced, and reproduced by politicians, mainstream media, and workers alike. This article draws on three years of ethnographic research with food couriers in the UK and France and explores how platform workers mobilise entrepreneurial aspirations to assess and enact their masculinity within and beyond the workspace. It focuses on two common tactics adopted by these workers: account renting and multi-apping. However, the intensification of work resulting from these practices – combined with a lack of citizenship rights and economic precarity – ultimately undermines their entrepreneurial ambitions.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261425848

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cosmin2026,
  title        = {{Migrant, Entrepreneur, Man: Platform Food Couriers’ Navigation of Precarity and Vulnerability}},
  author       = {Cosmin Popan},
  journal      = {Journal of Sociology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833261425848},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Migrant, Entrepreneur, Man: Platform Food Couriers’ Navigation of Precarity and Vulnerability

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.