arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Trust and Reputation in the Sharing Economy: Toward a Peer-to-Peer Ethics

Soraj Hongladarom

International Review of Information Ethics2020https://doi.org/10.29173/irie387article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

The sharing economy and peer-to-peer business relationships using information technology has become moreimportant in today’s world. For the sharing economy to work, however, trust and reputation are cruciallyimportant. I argue that the gathering of personal data needs to be accompanied by safeguards providing aguarantee of privacy rights. This argument will be based on a sketch of a theory called ‘peer-to-peer ethics.’Basically, the idea is that what constitutes the ground for normativity is something that is agreed upon byeveryone involved. In short, what is considered to be ‘good’ is whatever contributes to bringing about thedesired goal of the community. This is a very familiar and ancient view on normative concepts, but, as I argue,one that deserves to be taken seriously especially as we enter into an intricately globalized world of ethicswhere worldviews clash with one another.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/irie387

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{soraj2020,
  title        = {{Trust and Reputation in the Sharing Economy: Toward a Peer-to-Peer Ethics}},
  author       = {Soraj Hongladarom},
  journal      = {International Review of Information Ethics},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/irie387},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Trust and Reputation in the Sharing Economy: Toward a Peer-to-Peer Ethics

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.