arbiter
JournalsAccount

Activating archives for the practice turn in International Relations

Katrin Travouillon & Nicolas Lemay-Hébert

European Journal of International Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661251408736article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

International practice theory (IPT) posits the primacy of empirics over theorisation, but what counts as empirical data? In this article, we discuss IPT scholars’ methodological preferences, specifically their prioritisation of ethnographic research over text-based analysis, the latter being understood as providing inferior access to practices. To contribute to a revision of IPT’s dismissive stance towards document analysis, we suggest bringing IPT in conversation with Critical Archival Studies (CAS) – a body of scholarship grounded in a relational and dynamic ontology of archives and committed to analyses of their embeddedness in politics and power relations. We argue that IPT can benefit from activating an analytical sensibility towards the archival practices of record-making, record-keeping and record-using. To support this argument and demonstrate its analytical value, we revisit official accounts of the interactions between interveners and the ‘targets of intervention’ during the United Nations’ Transitional Authority in Cambodia. Through an in-depth analysis of a unique archival collection of 835 Khmer-language letters the Cambodian people sent to Radio United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC) in 1993, we provide new perspectives on the people’s lived experiences during the intervention, while also illuminating the implications of archives in the enabling and justification of dominant intervention practices.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661251408736

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{katrin2026,
  title        = {{Activating archives for the practice turn in International Relations}},
  author       = {Katrin Travouillon & Nicolas Lemay-Hébert},
  journal      = {European Journal of International Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661251408736},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Activating archives for the practice turn in International Relations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.