arbiter
JournalsAccount

Does the Court care about the coalface? The European Social Model and the continued Constitutional Imbalance between ‘market’ and ‘social’ values

Sacha Garben

Common Market Law Review2026https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2026025article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper argues that despite recent scholarly accounts arguing the contrary, an asymmetry between 'the market' and 'the social' continues to exist in the EU legal order. This asymmetry manifests itself, in particular, in the case law, which - more as the rule than as the exception - underprotects the values of the European Social Model and overvalues economic freedom. A new frontier of negative economic integration is being crossed in the interpretation of Article 16 EUCFR (the freedom to conduct a business), while social fundamental rights are overlooked and misunderstood. Furthermore, despite the (politically driven) post-Brexit renaissance of Social Europe over the past decade, the constitutional scope of positive social integration through European-level collective bargaining (cf. EPSU) and legislation (cf. EU Minimum Wages) has been constrained. This paper argues that the resulting imbalance is contrary to the identity of the EU legal order as laid down in the Treaties and the Charter, which reflects an attachment to ‘social democracy’, and that it is for the Court to correct, as it is largely of its own making

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2026025

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sacha2026,
  title        = {{Does the Court care about the coalface? The European Social Model and the continued Constitutional Imbalance between ‘market’ and ‘social’ values}},
  author       = {Sacha Garben},
  journal      = {Common Market Law Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2026025},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Does the Court care about the coalface? The European Social Model and the continued Constitutional Imbalance between ‘market’ and ‘social’ values

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.