Dynamic Pricing Under Self-Exciting Arrival Processes

Quan Yuan et al.

Operations Research2026https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.1172article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Pricing with a Ripple Effect How should firms price when each sale sparks the next? In their paper, “Dynamic Pricing Under Self-Exciting Arrival Processes,” Quan Yuan, Longyuan Du, and Ming Hu study pricing decisions in markets where customer purchases actively stimulate future demand through word-of-mouth and social influence. Using a self-exciting (Hawkes) process to model the demand process, the authors show that optimal prices depend on both time and an “excitement level” summarizing accumulated customer influence. A key insight is that optimal prices may rise or fall with demand momentum, depending on whether the market is in a growth or saturation phase. The paper further demonstrates that simple, easy-to-implement deterministic (nonstationary) pricing heuristics can perform nearly as well as fully dynamic policies at large demand volumes. These results provide actionable guidance for firms operating in social media–driven markets, where this hour’s customers shape the next hour’s demand, and highlight the importance of explicitly accounting for the ripple effect of purchases in pricing design.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.1172

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{quan2026,
  title        = {{Dynamic Pricing Under Self-Exciting Arrival Processes}},
  author       = {Quan Yuan et al.},
  journal      = {Operations Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2024.1172},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dynamic Pricing Under Self-Exciting Arrival Processes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.