The governance of global supply chains: empirical insights from the ready‐made garment industry in Bangladesh a decade after Rana Plaza

T. Iqbal

Journal of Law and Society2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70049article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The regulation of activities in global supply chains presents significant challenges, particularly in establishing corporate accountability for human rights violations and addressing extraterritorial oversight. Due to the unwillingness or limited capacity of governments to regulate the social externalities of global business activities, the last decade has seen an increase in schemes that use non‐state authority to govern corporate conduct beyond borders. Drawing on a qualitative study of the ready‐made garment industry in Bangladesh, this article examines the effectiveness of industry‐led private governance regimes and the corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices of multinational corporations in global supply chains, as well as the extent to which private governance can serve as an effective alternative to obligatory regulatory frameworks. The findings confirm that, while both voluntary and mandatory regulatory mechanisms are beneficial, various factors hinder their execution and limit their ability to adequately address corporate abuses of human rights.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70049

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{t.2026,
  title        = {{The governance of global supply chains: empirical insights from the ready‐made garment industry in Bangladesh a decade after Rana Plaza}},
  author       = {T. Iqbal},
  journal      = {Journal of Law and Society},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70049},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The governance of global supply chains: empirical insights from the ready‐made garment industry in Bangladesh a decade after Rana Plaza

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.