arbiter
JournalsAccount

Ecologies of justice in the climate crisis: Europe’s socio-legal turmoil

Christina Eckes

Common Market Law Review2026https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2026009article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Climate litigation before the European Court of Human Rights, the International Court of Justice, and national courts reveals the gap between States’ proclaimed climate ambitions and their actual emission reductions. It compels governments to justify inaction and engages them in processes of public reason-giving. This contribution argues that such judicial engagement plays a vital democratic role in Europe’s response to the climate crisis. By establishing factual truth and fairness amid polarization, courts enhance the rationality of deliberation and strengthen democratic legitimacy. Situating these practices within broader ‘justification relationships’ among institutions, the analysis shows law’s capacity to mediate tensions. Against this backdrop, it critically examines the role of the European Union in mitigating the climate crisis and the reluctance of the Court of Justice of the European Union to address the EU’s climate obligations. It contends that the Court of Justice’s judicial engagement is essential to uphold both democratic legitimacy and ecological justice in Europe.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2026009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christina2026,
  title        = {{Ecologies of justice in the climate crisis: Europe’s socio-legal turmoil}},
  author       = {Christina Eckes},
  journal      = {Common Market Law Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2026009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ecologies of justice in the climate crisis: Europe’s socio-legal turmoil

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.