arbiter
JournalsAccount

Toward an Expanded Role for Indigenous Law in the Assessment of Moral Blameworthiness in Criminal Matters

Michael Luba

Alberta Law Review2026https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2885article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article provides a critique of Canadian courts’ attempted integration of Indigenous laws into sentencing for criminal matters. First, it examines Canadian courts’ approach to resolving conflicts between Indigenous and Canadian laws in the context of recent criminal contempt proceedings in British Columbia, contrasting this approach with other legal domains. Second, it argues that Canada’s recognition of Indigenous laws creates an obligation to incorporate them into determinations of moral blameworthiness. Third, it analyzes the normative rationales underpinning Canada’s sentencing regime. Fourth, it argues that a failure to consider conflicts of Indigenous and Canadian laws in sentencing compromises the principle of proportionality. Fifth, it proposes a relaxed standard for admitting evidence of a conflict of Indigenous and Canadian laws at sentencing.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2885

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michael2026,
  title        = {{Toward an Expanded Role for Indigenous Law in the Assessment of Moral Blameworthiness in Criminal Matters}},
  author       = {Michael Luba},
  journal      = {Alberta Law Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2885},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Toward an Expanded Role for Indigenous Law in the Assessment of Moral Blameworthiness in Criminal Matters

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.