arbiter
JournalsAccount

They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires

Louise M. Hassan et al.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01105-5article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.54

Abstract

Brands are under increasing pressure to champion customer diversity, equity, and inclusion, but do customers always appreciate such efforts? Drawing on identity literature, we investigate when customer diversity initiatives (CDIs) backfire and propose strategies to mitigate this. Our research reveals that CDIs targeting a dissociative group more permanently evokes higher levels of brand distancing behaviors among existing customers compared to temporary efforts. This effect is driven by identity signaling threat and perceived betrayal. Aligning the duration of CDI with customers’ relationship types can help mitigate these negative reactions for sincere brands. Moreover, a sub-brand or product customization strategy reduces customers’ identity signaling threat toward a dissociative CDI, whilst highlighting the brand’s pro-social goals partially mitigates threat perceptions for sincere brands. Our findings offer critical insights for managers on promoting diversity without alienating existing customers.

9 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01105-5

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{louise2025,
  title        = {{They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires}},
  author       = {Louise M. Hassan et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01105-5},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

They’re not my people: When inclusive marketing backfires

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.54

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.52 × 0.4 = 0.21
M · momentum0.72 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.