arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Moral Accounting and Real Effort: Experimental Evidence

Eberhard Feess et al.

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2025-0046article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Individuals who face consecutive decisions may engage in moral accounting - balancing moral consequences of initial decisions through behavior in subsequent decisions. Yet the evidence is mixed and studies vary in whether participants actively make morally questionable decisions or are passively assigned to moral conditions. Our experiment contributes to the literature by contrasting active and passive outcomes in the first stage, implementing a real effort task in the second stage, and developing a game-theoretical model that addresses self-selection and moral accounting. The results demonstrate moral accounting effects only when participants actively choose the morally questionable option in the first stage.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2025-0046

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{eberhard2025,
  title        = {{Moral Accounting and Real Effort: Experimental Evidence}},
  author       = {Eberhard Feess et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2025-0046},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Moral Accounting and Real Effort: Experimental Evidence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.