arbiter
JournalsAccount

Audit Risk Disclosures, Targeted Inspections, and Audit Quality

Kyungha Lee & Rahul Menon

Contemporary Accounting Research2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.70033article
FT50AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article studies how the mandatory disclosure of audit risk and targeted regulatory inspections influence audit quality. We develop a model in which the auditor tests a firm's internal control over financial reporting before auditing the financial report and must issue an opinion on both. Due to higher regulatory scrutiny received by audits with weak internal control opinions, we show that targeted inspections generate countervailing effects: they reduce the auditor's internal control audit effort while increasing substantive testing effort. We show that a positive level of targeted inspections can improve audit quality when the level of random inspections is high. Furthermore, we show that targeted inspections are not always consistent with risk‐based inspections, due to the auditor's strategic response to the oversight measures. Nevertheless, such targeting can still result in higher audit quality. Our results suggest the need to exercise caution when using audit risk disclosures as a basis for enforcement.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.70033

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kyungha2026,
  title        = {{Audit Risk Disclosures, Targeted Inspections, and Audit Quality}},
  author       = {Kyungha Lee & Rahul Menon},
  journal      = {Contemporary Accounting Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.70033},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Audit Risk Disclosures, Targeted Inspections, and Audit Quality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.