← Back to results International Tax Planning: The Fallout from Alta Energy Luxembourg—The Application of GAAR to Tax Treaties Brian J. Arnold
Abstract This article examines three factors that were influential in the Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Canada v. Alta Energy Luxembourg SARL with respect to the potential application of the general anti-avoidance rule to the Canada-Luxembourg tax treaty: (1) the presumption that the contracting states know about each other’s domestic income tax system, (2) the dual nature of tax treaties as statutes and treaties, and (3) the theory of economic allegiance. It argues that, irrespective of whether one considers the court’s decision to be correct or incorrect, the court did not understand or apply these factors properly.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2025.73.1.itp Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{brian2025,
title = {{International Tax Planning: The Fallout from Alta Energy Luxembourg—The Application of GAAR to Tax Treaties}},
author = {Brian J. Arnold},
journal = {Canadian Tax Journal},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2025.73.1.itp},
} TY - JOUR
TI - International Tax Planning: The Fallout from Alta Energy Luxembourg—The Application of GAAR to Tax Treaties
AU - Arnold, Brian J.
JO - Canadian Tax Journal
PY - 2025
ER - Brian J. Arnold (2025). International Tax Planning: The Fallout from Alta Energy Luxembourg—The Application of GAAR to Tax Treaties. *Canadian Tax Journal*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2025.73.1.itp Brian J. Arnold. "International Tax Planning: The Fallout from Alta Energy Luxembourg—The Application of GAAR to Tax Treaties." *Canadian Tax Journal* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2025.73.1.itp. International Tax Planning: The Fallout from Alta Energy Luxembourg—The Application of GAAR to Tax Treaties
Brian J. Arnold · Canadian Tax Journal · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2025.73.1.itp Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.