arbiter
JournalsAccount

Unintended prosocial consequences of robot prevalence: The mediating role of realistic threat

Sungwoo Choi & Jihwan Yeon

International Journal of Hospitality Management2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2026.104602article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

With the growing shift to service automation in the hospitality industry, robot prevalence is on the rise. Drawing on the intergroup threat theory and terror management theory, we argue that as service robots become more prevalent, consumers may become prosocial in response to a realistic threat. Additionally, we theorize that these effects will be salient among those who are employed, especially those who use artificial intelligence or robots at work. The results of four experimental studies support our hypotheses. Our findings provide practical insight into how companies can leverage such behavioral shifts among consumers to maximize the effectiveness of their prosocial initiatives. • Consumers may become prosocial as service robots become more prevalent. • The effect of robot prevalence is explained by realistic threat. • The robot prevalence effect is stronger among employed individuals. • The robot prevalence effect is stronger among individuals using AI/robots at work.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2026.104602

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sungwoo2026,
  title        = {{Unintended prosocial consequences of robot prevalence: The mediating role of realistic threat}},
  author       = {Sungwoo Choi & Jihwan Yeon},
  journal      = {International Journal of Hospitality Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2026.104602},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unintended prosocial consequences of robot prevalence: The mediating role of realistic threat

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.