Behind Closed Doors: The Uncommunal Feminine Stereotype

Andrew Martin & Francis J. Flynn

Organization Science2026https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2026.21948article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Theories of gender inequality in the workplace rely heavily on stereotypes that describe women as more communal (e.g., warm and kind) and less agentic (e.g., assertive and forceful) than men. In this paper, we highlight the existence of an uncommunal feminine stereotype wherein women are also believed to be more conniving and devious than men, pursuing their personal goals at the expense of others. To explain how this uncommunal stereotype can coexist with its communal counterpart, we posit that women are believed to behave more communally in public and more uncommunally in private. This public-private distinction can reconcile conflicting stereotypes of women’s communality and better account for aspects of inequality. In particular, the uncommunal stereotype provides an alternative attribution for women’s success when it occurs, explains the greater vigilance to and sanctioning of women’s unethical behavior, and strengthens backlash theory by better explaining why successful women are distrusted. In these ways and others, accounting for the uncommunal feminine stereotype can enhance gender theory.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2026.21948

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andrew2026,
  title        = {{Behind Closed Doors: The Uncommunal Feminine Stereotype}},
  author       = {Andrew Martin & Francis J. Flynn},
  journal      = {Organization Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2026.21948},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Behind Closed Doors: The Uncommunal Feminine Stereotype

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.