arbiter
JournalsAccount

To Believe or Not to Believe in Conspiracy Claims? That Is a Question for Signal Detection Theory

Maude Tagand et al.

Psychological Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976261417245article
AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Conspiracy mentality is conceptualized as a continuum. Research on this topic has focused on unwarranted conspiracy claims and the upper end of the conspiracy-mentality continuum-people seeing conspiracies everywhere. This focus neglects warranted conspiracy claims and the lower end of the continuum. To better understand conspiracy mentality, we aimed to clarify both ends of the continuum using signal detection theory. We examined how people evaluate warranted and unwarranted conspiracy claims across levels of conspiracy mentality in two studies with 331 French-speaking adult participants from France, Switzerland, and Belgium (Study 1) and 576 English-speaking adult participants from the United States and the United Kingdom (Study 2), both groups recruited via Prolific. Compared with participants high in conspiracy mentality, those low in conspiracy mentality not only believed less in conspiracies but also underestimated their prevalence. However, participants low in conspiracy mentality were more accurate at distinguishing warranted from unwarranted conspiracy claims. These results provide a better understanding of conspiracy mentality and its relationship with the perceived truthfulness of conspiracies.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976261417245

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{maude2026,
  title        = {{To Believe or Not to Believe in Conspiracy Claims? That Is a Question for Signal Detection Theory}},
  author       = {Maude Tagand et al.},
  journal      = {Psychological Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976261417245},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

To Believe or Not to Believe in Conspiracy Claims? That Is a Question for Signal Detection Theory

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.