arbiter
JournalsAccount

Toward a Unified Conceptualization of Social Capital

Paulina Erices-Ocampo et al.

Annual Review of Sociology2025https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090924-032037article
AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Social capital is among the most broadly used concepts in social science. Despite its shared understanding as beneficial resources available from the connections between people, authors vary widely in their conceptualizations of social capital. To extract clarity from these disparate perspectives, we offer a systematic framework for conceptualizing social capital, which identifies three primary theoretical dimensions of scholars’ conceptualizations of social capital: ( a ) where beneficial resources reside, ranging from within individuals to the relationships between individuals; ( b ) beneficial network structure, differentiating closure from brokerage arrangements; and ( c ) the level to which rewards accrue, distinguishing individual from collective benefits. We illustrate how combining these dimensions produces a unifying perspective that fosters reintegrating social capital's disconnected conceptualizations. Finally, we draw on this framework to both reconcile seeming contradictions and gaps in social capital scholarship, and provide a principled means for prioritizing questions for future developments of social capital.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090924-032037

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paulina2025,
  title        = {{Toward a Unified Conceptualization of Social Capital}},
  author       = {Paulina Erices-Ocampo et al.},
  journal      = {Annual Review of Sociology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090924-032037},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Toward a Unified Conceptualization of Social Capital

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.