arbiter
JournalsAccount

Accentuation explains the difference between choice and rejection better than compatibility: A commentary on Chandrashekar et al. (2021)

Yoav Ganzach

Judgment and Decision Making2025https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.26article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

In this comment, I examine the results of two studies (Shafir, 1993 and Chandrashekar et al., 2021) that relied on the same stimuli to examine the effect of framing selection tasks in terms of choosing versus rejecting, and discuss how, despite the failure of the later study to replicate the results of the earlier one, analyzing the similarities and differences between the two advances our understanding of the processes underlying decisions in general, and decision in such tasks in particular.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.26

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yoav2025,
  title        = {{Accentuation explains the difference between choice and rejection better than compatibility: A commentary on Chandrashekar et al. (2021)}},
  author       = {Yoav Ganzach},
  journal      = {Judgment and Decision Making},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.26},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Accentuation explains the difference between choice and rejection better than compatibility: A commentary on Chandrashekar et al. (2021)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.